data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c20a/2c20a2b27dd471db477c7290756b798eedf8beba" alt="" |
Messages and Online Forum Q&A
If you find the answer to this question useful, kindly CLICK
TO PAY here. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39068/3906831c753049afb88d5bd94656af4c6149696c" alt=""
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88682/886825521c58501439ed9ef4a4310407dbbfe429" alt="" |
|
lvl beam supportsFrom: tmalenich@notes.sunysb.edu Category: Carpentry and Framing Remote Name: 129.49.92.182 Date: 28 Aug 2005 Time: 08:20 AM
CommentsI am replacing an inadequate beam (3 - 2x8s) with 2 microlam 14" beams. The length will be 13'. Support posting must occupy a 4" wall at both ends (don't want to see the posts sticking out from the wall). The walls will be sheetrocked. 2 - 2x4s or a single 4x4 seems weak as a post, yet that is all that can catch the total 3" microlam thickness. Can I use a double 2x4 header under the beam and then group 6 2x4s under the header? Would a steel post be better to use than the previous idea? Thanks for any advise
|
|